Abundance New York 2026 Congressional Candidate Questionnaire
Darializa Avila Chevalier
Congressional District NY-13
Background
Please briefly describe your background and why you are running for this office.
I am a working-class Afro-Latina based in Harlem and I come from a working class immigrant family. My dad is a truck driver – his dad was a truck driver– and my mom, a single mother, worked at various organizations as a case manager but took on extra work, like cleaning and selling Mary Kay products to help pay the bills. My mother’s father was part of the resistance against Trujillo and Balaguer, two US-backed dictators who stole his youth. My mom has childhood memories of him having to go into hiding to avoid being detained or tortured or worse. Like most families who come from countries and eras where these types of brutal regimes terrorized their communities, my family does not often like to discuss this period. But since launching this campaign, my family has said to me, “If only your grandfather could see you for a day.” Because they know, as I know, that we are facing a similar crisis here, in the US, today.
I have been organizing for a fairer, more equitable, and more affordable New York City since I was a teenager. Growing up I visited NYC often as I had family here. At 18, I moved to the district as a student at Columbia University where I became an organizer advocating to end sexual violence on campus, fighting my school’s role in displacing communities of color, and demanding divestment from Israeli apartheid. After graduating, I organized against mass incarceration and to support New Yorkers through various mutual aid and direct action campaigns with BYP100. As an organizer at Families for Freedom and beyond, I worked to free people from ICE detention and advocate for a more just immigration system. Finally, since the onset of the ongoing genocide in Palestine, I have been a part of numerous direct and mass civil disobedience actions and advocacy efforts demanding an end to the genocide and calling for a full arms embargo on Israel. As a PhD candidate in sociology at the Graduate Center, CUNY, I spent many years as an educator at Lehman College, NYU, and Barnard. My doctoral research has focused on the criminalization of migrants, the U.S. deportation regime and the role and history of Anti-Black racism inherent to the “national security” project that is our immigration system. I am currently a public defense investigator at the Neighborhood Defenders Services of Harlem. Now I’m running for Congress in NY-13 to ensure we provide housing for all, end childhood poverty by investing in our babies, not bombs, and abolish ICE once and for all.
How are you differentiated from your opponent(s)? What does your path to victory look like in your district?
Adriano Espaillat is currently a five-term incumbent Congressman representing NY-13. Under his watch – now as the Ranking member of Housing, Construction & Community Development – housing prices have skyrocketed, as he has received thousands of dollars from real estate developers and Columbia University (the largest private landowner in New York City). As the inequality between the richest and poorest Americans continues to grow at an alarming rate, Espaillat does not believe in taxing the rich – as evinced by his lack of support for the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act, and Stop Wall Street Looting Act, nor has he been willing to stand with working people. When NYSNA nurses went on strike, he offered tepid support only after I showed up to the picket line and spoke to nurses to uplift their demands. Many of his donors are on the boards of the private hospitals these nurses were striking.
Despite being the chair of the CHC, Espaillat has failed to take meaningful action on immigration reform and has consistently been absent when immigrant families seek his support. When my friend and fellow organizer, Mahmoud Khalil was kidnapped by ICE, in this very district, Espaillat twice refused to meet with his family and many of our friends. Just 8 days later the Trump administration, in violation of judicial orders, deported over 200 Venezuelan migrants to a concentration camp in El Salvador. Espaillat’s inaction on Mahmoud’s case and the case of many other Columbia University students living in NY-13. His indifference to these student organizers and his silence on how Columbia University has targeted students and faculty condemning the genocide in Gaza has opened the door to the Trump administration’s the current weaponization of ICE as a cudgel for facism and attacks on higher education. Even now, despite immigration being a top concern for people in NY-13, and 77% of Democrats supporting calls to abolish ICE, my opponent refuses to take a strong stance and demand ICE be abolished. And, in the face of ICE terrorizing our communities, Espaillat has called for increased training and hiring standards for ICE and refocusing on public safety.
This is a winnable district. We know this firstly because Zohran won this district in 2025 by 19 points and fundamentally changed the voting bloc in upper Manhattan and the Bronx. There was a record turnout in this district, with 33k new voters who have never voted in a primary coming out to the polls. Espaillat knows this, which is why he flipped his endorsement from Cuomo in the primary to Zohran in the general. He knows that he is vulnerable. Second, Espaillat has a ceiling of support. He has far less name recognition and district support than he would like to believe. An outside poll in January showed that he only had 41% on a blind ask shows how vulnerable he is.
We plan to win this race by putting together a coalition that can raise over 1 million (we are on track to meet this goal), and can deliver a strong field operation to drive up voter outreach and turnout. We have received an incredible outpouring of support. I’ve been endorsed by NYC-DSA, UAW, Justice Democrats, Jewish Voice for Peace Action, Sunrise Movement, CAIR Action, Track AIPAC, PAL PAC, USCPR, Claire Valdez, Jamaal Bowman, Jabari Brisport, Diana Moreno, Sarahana Shrestha, Emily Gallagher, and Chi Osse.
Government Delivery Reform
NEPA Reform: Congress should reform the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to reduce the time and scope of federal environmental review for housing, transit, renewable energy, and resilience projects. NEPA delays affect federally funded projects in New York, adding years and significant costs to critical infrastructure.
Agree
Capital Project Procurement Reform: Congress should give federal agencies and their state and local grantees more procurement flexibility—such as expanded other transaction authority and performance-based contracting—to speed up delivery of federally funded capital projects. This should include examining Buy America requirements and federal cost-sharing rules that inflate project costs.
Agree
Additional context
(No response)
Housing
Expanding Housing: Addressing the housing affordability crisis requires increasing production of all kinds of housing, including market-rate units. Congress should increase federal support for housing production through funding and regulatory changes, including by tying federal transportation, infrastructure, and community development funding to pro-supply local policies such as zoning and permitting reform.
Agree
Homelessness: Congress should increase federal funding for Housing First approaches, including permanent supportive housing, as the primary strategy for addressing homelessness.
Agree
Transit-Oriented Development: Congress should incentivize transit-oriented development by conditioning federal transit funding on local zoning changes that allow more housing near transit stations.
Agree
Build Code Reform: Congress should support research, funding, financing, and model codes that encourage cheaper construction methods (e.g., modular construction, mass timber) while maintaining safety.
Agree
Repeal the Faircloth Amendment: Congress should repeal the Faircloth Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal funds to build new public housing units beyond the number that existed in 1999, to allow for the construction of new public housing.
Agree
Additional context
(No response)
Transit
Transit Cost Containment: Congress should act to reduce the cost of federally funded transit projects, including by reforming FTA New Starts and Capital Investment Grant requirements, streamlining federal review, and encouraging cost-containment practices as a condition of federal funding.
Agree
Bus Transit Investment: Congress should leverage its funding for bus transit to encourage the creation of busways and bus rapid transit where appropriate to increase the speed of buses and the efficiency of federal investments, including through programs like the FTA's Capital Investment Grants and Bus and Bus Facilities program.
Agree
Automated Camera Enforcement: Congress should remove or oppose federal restrictions that limit state and local use of automated traffic enforcement—such as red light cameras, speed cameras, and bike lane cameras—and should allow federal highway safety funds to support automated enforcement expansion.
Agree
Parking: New York City should charge more for parking and reduce or eliminate free street parking.
Agree
Additional context
(No response)
Clean Energy & Climate Resilience
Solar Energy: New York State should preempt local regulations that effectively ban solar projects by establishing a ceiling on restrictions and should streamline solar permitting by adopting automated systems in order to enable more solar energy.
Agree
Nuclear Energy: Congress should support expanding U.S. nuclear energy capacity by funding new reactor designs, streamlining NRC licensing, and extending the operating licenses of existing plants in order to hit the goal of 100% zero-emission electricity generation by 2040.
Disagree
Geothermal Energy: Congress should support the expansion of geothermal energy development through federal research funding, streamlined permitting, and incentives for deployment, including in dense urban areas like New York.
Agree
Transmission Co-Location: Congress should support legislation that prioritizes existing highway, railroad, and utility rights-of-way for the siting of new electricity transmission lines, reducing permitting delays and landowner conflicts while accelerating the buildout of transmission capacity needed to deliver clean energy.
Agree
Climate Resilience Investments: Congress should increase federal investment in climate resilience infrastructure, including coastal defenses, stormwater management, and cooling infrastructure, with priority given to socially vulnerable communities.
Agree
Buyout Reform: Congress should reform federal disaster buyout programs—including those administered through FEMA and HUD—to accelerate the relocation of families out of high-risk flood zones, with streamlined environmental review, standing funding, and expanded eligibility for renters.
Agree
Additional context
(No response)
Candidate Statement
Abundance Examples from Your Work: Please describe a specific example from your record (legislative, professional, or community work) where you championed a project or policy that is aligned with our agenda. What obstacles did you overcome, and what was the outcome?
I’ve been a community organizer my entire adult life. I’ve organized to end mass incarceration, for immigration justice, and for Palestinian human rights and liberation. I’ve built community by working as part of and alongside numerous community groups and organizations to build out campaigns that demand divestment from Israeli apartheid, sought the release of people detained in ICE detention facilities, provided critical mutual aid to economically vulnerable Black New Yorkers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, advocated to end housing discrimination against system impacted people, called for an arms embargo on Israel and an end to its genocide against the Palestinian people. I have been very vocal on these issues by writing publicly about them and speaking to the press; leading community teach-ins and trainings; helping to organize mass rallies, civil disobedience protests, and direct actions; and incorporating my values into every facet of my personal and professional life. As a PhD Candidate in Sociology, I think a lot about the social systems and structures that impact how people interact with the world around them. So when Justice Democrats reached out to tell me I’d been nominated to run for Congress, I asked them why they thought I was the right candidate. Their answer, that I’d been so public with my values for so long, made me realize that the organizing work I was doing was important not only for its own sake, but because I was also inadvertently creating a system of accountability to my values and to my community.
Legislative Priorities: If elected (or re-elected) to Congress, what are your top three legislative priorities? Please be specific about the policies you would advance and what you hope to achieve.
I have been a grassroots organizer my entire adult life, and will continue to organize in Congress to make the lives of New Yorkers more affordable. I am running on a platform of: housing for all, abolishing ICE, and investing in our babies, not bombs. I also believe in working to build a society in which governing systems foster racial, social, and economic justice. I am a proud supporter of taxing the rich, to provide Medicare for all, for expanding social security and the child tax credit and providing universal free college, for increasing the minimum wage and the Green New Deal, and for safeguarding American democracy by removing money from our political process.